vi.4. Progressive ari, along with ergative subject and transitive auxiliary *edun ‘have’: ari dut  (v ari naiz)
Author: Kristina Bilbao
Egile beraren beste kapituluak:
i.1. Dative (first) objects in transitive verbs: itxarongo dizut, diot (v itxarongo zaitut, dut)
i.3. Dative marking of the unaccusative causee: etorrarazi  dizute (v etorrarazi zaituzte)
i.13. Partitive marker to make emphasis in existential clauses: badugu sagar onik (v baditugu sagar onak)
v.1. Instrumental/inessive alternation in temporal modifiers: the instrumental (-z) (v the inessive (-n))
vi.1. Stage level copular verbs: izan (v egon)
vi.2. Expressing possession: eduki, ukan  (v izan/*edun)
vi.3. Ukan ‘have’ instead of izan ‘be’ in resultative participial contexts
vi.4. Progressive ari, along with ergative subject and transitive auxiliary *edun ‘have’: ari dut  (v ari naiz)
vi.5. Progressive periphrases: ibili, egon  jardun, erauntsi (v ari izan)
vii.1. Partitive in appositive relative phrases with undetermined antecedent: -ik (v -a)
vii.2. Non-factive complements: -(r)ik (v -(e)la)
vii.3. Non-factive sentential complements: -(e)n  (v -(e)la)
vii.4. Factive sentential complements: -(e)na (v -(e)la) 
Cite this page as: Bilbao, Kristina. (2022). Progressive ari, along with ergative subject and transitive auxiliary *edun ‘have’: ari dut  (v ari naiz). In Bilbao, Kristina, Ane Odria, Ane Berro, Josu Landa & Beatriz Fernndez (eds.), Euskara Bariazioan / Basque in Variation (BiV) (3. edit.). UPV/EHU Editorial Service. [Available online: https://basqueandbeyond.ehu.eus/biv/?o=chapters&id=6&e=38]. ISBN: 978-84-1319-456-1.
Contents
Keywords
References
vi. (In)Transitivity
vi.1. Stage level copular verbs: izan (v egon)
vi.2. Expressing possession: eduki, ukan  (v izan/*edun)
vi.3. Ukan ‘have’ instead of izan ‘be’ in resultative participial contexts
vi.4. Progressive ari, along with ergative subject and transitive auxiliary *edun ‘have’: ari dut  (v ari naiz)
vi.5. Progressive periphrases: ibili, egon  jardun, erauntsi (v ari izan)
Keywords
(in)transitivity, auxiliary alternation, ergativity, progressive aspect, root alternation
References

Demirdache, Hamida and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2000. «The Primitives of Temporal Relations». In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J.Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press. 157-186.

Epelde, Irantzu. 2004a. «Lapurdiko hego-ekialdeko euskararen kokapenerantz». FLV, 36, 96. 271-304.

Holmer, Anders. 1999. «An active analysis of Basque ergativity». Fontes Linguae Vasconum 81: 189-225.

Hualde, José Ignacio and Jon Ortiz de Urbina. 1987. «Restructuring with ARI». ASJU International Journal of Basque Philology, XXI-2, 425-452.

Irizar, Pedro. 1997. Morfología del verbo auxiliar labortano (estudio dialectológico). Iruñea: Euskaltzaindia & UPV/EHU.

Laka, Itziar. 2004. «Ari progresiboaz: euskararen kasu markak». In Pablo Albizu and Beatriz Fernández (eds.), Euskal Gramatika XXI. mendearen atarian: arazo zaharrak, azterbide berriak. Bilbao: UPV/EHU. 113-132.

Laka, Itziar. 2006. «Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive: the Case of Basque». In Alana Johns, Diane Massam and Juvénal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging Issues. Dordrecht/Berlin: Springer. 173-195.

Mitxelena, Koldo and Ibon Sarasola. 1989-2005. Diccionario General Vasco / Orotariko Euskal Hiztegia. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.